Jieguang Songa,b,*, Yue Liuc, Chunxiao Wua, Xueqing
Yanga, Yipeng Gonga, Jianzhen Huanga, Chunyan
Hea, Huihui Luoa and Aixia Chend
aKey laboratory for Industrial Ceramics of Jiangxi Province, School of
Materials and Chemistry Engineering, Pingxiang University, Pingxiang 337055
China
bResearch Institute of Sponge City, Pingxiang University, Pingxiang
337055 China
cEngineering & Technology Research Center for Environmental
Protection Materials and Equipment of Jiangxi Province, School of Materials and
Chemistry Engineering, Pingxiang University, Pingxiang 337055 China
dSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering; Jiujiang
University, Jiujiang 332005, China
Cermet application is
extensive because it retains the characteristics of ceramic materials and has
the advantages of metal materials. In this paper, alumina/aluminum cermet
materials were prepared through powder metallurgy method. The influence of raw
material formula on the properties of alumina/aluminum cermet was investigated
on the basis that ceramic materials have good wear resistance and high thermal
conductivity. Results show that when the mass ratio of alumina to aluminum is
1:3, the prepared cermet samples have excellent properties, highest density,
and uniform distribution of aluminum and alumina. MgO addition exhibits better
effect, higher degree of densification, and renders higher hardness and
strength for the sample as compared with SiO2 and Y2O3
addition. The sintered cermet with composite powder prepared via precipitation
has better properties and higher densities and surface hardness than that
prepared via the ball mill method. The relative density was 97.1%, surface
hardness was 875 HV, and electric resistance was 0.0169 Ω·m.
Keywords: Cermet materials, alumina, aluminum, raw material, electric resistivity
Cermet is a heterogeneous composite material composed of
metal or alloy and one or more ceramic phases, in which the latter accounts for
approximately 15 ~ 85% of material volume. When prepared at a certain
temperature, cermet’s metal and ceramic phases are weakly dissolved [1-3]. The
ceramic part of cermet makes it extremely hard, wear, corrosion, heat, and
oxidation resistant, and chemically stable, and its metal composition makes it
very strong, tough, thermally and electrically conductive, the solid particles
in cermet combined with the metal phase provide its high strength and
plasticity and make it a high-performance engineering
material [4, 5]. The performance of ceramic-metal
composites depends on the properties of the metal and ceramic, their volume
percentages, bonding properties, and bonding strength of the phase interface
[6, 7].
As one of the most widely used ceramic components, alumina
ceramic is an abundant raw material that is extremely strong and hard, less
dense, and chemically stable. However, its brittleness hinders its application.
Strong metal toughening is most commonly used for alumina ceramic. Aluminum
(Al)-based composite has Al or Al alloy as the matrix and its fiber or particle as
a reinforcement of the homogeneous mixture.
This material has highly specific strength, specific modulus, fatigue
resistance, extreme toughness and impact resistance, high temperature,
and excellent wear resistance. Al2O3/Al
metal-ceramic matrix composites are lightweight, extremely strong, ductile,
tough, and aluminum-processed; alumina ceramics are extremely strong, hard,
heat-resistant, wear-resistant, corrosion-resistant, and chemically stable;
therefore, the Al2O3/Al metal matrix composites in the
modern industrial production have an increasingly important role [8-10]. In
this paper, the preparation of cermet through the preparation of sintered powders can significantly
improve the sintering densification
effect and the uniform distribution of the reinforcing phases. the compactness
of Al2O3/Al cermet was improved to enhance its wear
resistance and low thermal conductivity.
The raw materials were Al powder, analytically pure Al2O3
powder, aluminum nitrate nonahydrate crystal, and ammonia water. Al2O3
powder, Al powder and 5 wt.% sintering aid were mixed in a ball mill at a
mixing speed of 100 rpm and mixing time of 2 h. One composite
material was prepared through the mechanical method, and
another through coprecipitation. The weighed Al powder was poured into
deionized water and stirred with a stirrer to form suspension slurry. An
aluminum nitrate solution configured with aluminum nitrate nonahydrate crystals
was dropped by a precipitation method. Ammonia water was added in the
suspension of Al powder, and the pH value of the suspension was maintained at 9
at all times. After the titration of the aluminum nitrate solution, stirring
was continued for 1 h. The suspension was filtered, washed three times with
deionized water, washed once with anhydrous ethanol, and finally
dried to obtain a composite powder, and set aside. The composite
powder prepared through precipitation was added with a 5 wt.%
sintering aid. A ball mill mixture was used to obtain another
composite raw material, which was reserved for further analysis. The mixed
powder was placed in a Φ20 mm × 10 mm mold and dried at 60 MPa. After
formation, the blank was placed in a vacuum carbon tube furnace
for high-temperature sintering. The sintering temperature
was 800 °C, the holding time was 2 h, and the heating rate was
5 °C/min. The sintered sample was surface
polished on a metallographic polisher for further use. The
sintered sample was subjected to density test using a BSA224S-CW type
electronic balance, and the density of the sample was calculated
by the relationship with the theoretical density. The surface hardness
of the sample was tested by the HV-1000 type Vickers hardness
tester, using TESCAN VEGA II. The microstructure and volume resistivity of the
sample were observed and measured using scanning electron microscopy and
CHT3540 DC resistance tester, respectively.
Fig. 1 shows the
macroscopic morphology of the alumina/aluminum cermet material sample. Fig. 1a
reveals that the surface of the sample has defects, and the edge portion has a
missing angle. The integrity of the sample is not high, indicating that the
bonding strength between the aluminum and alumina
particles is not high, and the strength of the sample is low. The overall integrity of the sample is high (Fig. 1b), indicating a high bond strength between the aluminum and alumina particles. A
defect is found in the edge of the sample (Fig. 1c),
indicating low strength of the sample and low bonding strength between the
aluminum and alumina particles. Adopting dry pressing technology, due to uneven
force or small force at the corners, it is easy to reduce the density of the corners and corners. The effect
of raw material ratio on the density and surface hardness of Al2O3-Al
metal ceramic materials is shown in Fig. 2. When the aluminum content in the
raw material increases, the density of the cermet increases first and then decreases. Surface hardness is greatly related to the hardness of the
material. The influence of density on surface hardness is direct and important
[11-13]. Therefore, the surface hardness of the cermet material also shows a
trend of increasing first and then decreasing. When the
alumina/aluminum raw material ratio is 1:3, the material has the highest
compactness at density reaching 94.8% and highest surface hardness among the
three ingredients. The microstructure of the sample is analyzed and shown in Fig. 3. The internal pores of the sample can be seen. When the ratio of
raw materials is 1:3, the distribution of aluminum and alumina is uniform, the
size of the powder is uniform, and the internal density is high, indicating
that the bonding strength between alumina and aluminum is high. The
hardness and strength of the sample.
Fig. 1 Fig. 1. Effect of raw materials ratio on the surface topography of materials. |
Fig. 2 Fig. 2. Effect of raw materials ratio on the density and surface hardness of materials. |
Fig. 3 Fig. 3. Effect of raw materials ratio on the microstructure of materials. |
Fig. 4
shows that the surface of the sample has good flatness. The
aluminum and alumina powders have high bonding strength, hardness,
and strength. The surface of sample b has defects. The
occurrence of delamination cracking indicated that the bonding
strength and surface hardness of sample a are not high, and the toughening
effect of SiO2 as a sintering aid on cermet is poor. Compared with
sample a, sample c has low surface flatness, and low strength, indicating that
the toughening effect of Y2O3 is not as good as that of
MgO.
Fig. 4 shows that adding a
sintering aid can significantly increase the sintering density of the sample. With the sintering aid, the sintering activity of the
surface of the alumina and aluminum powder particles can be improved during the
sintering of the green body; hence, the sintering neck between the particles is
easily formed, and the sintering aid is added to reduce the
minimum eutectic point of the sample [14, 15]. Under the same temperature
conditions, the amounts of particles migrating to the sintered neck increases,
and the ability to eliminate pores between the particles is enhanced in the green body. The sintering aid can improve the cohesiveness
between the alumina and aluminum particles to ensure that they are bonded by
effective grain boundary substances [16, 17], thus promoting the reduction of
porosity and increasing the alumina/aluminum ratio. The densification
degree of the cermet material is shown in Fig. 5. The surface hardness of the
material increases with its density. Fig. 5 and 6 show that the sintering
effect of MgO is better than that of SiO2 and Y2O3; the sample with MgO has higher hardness and strength and better densification degree
than those with SiO2 and Y2O3. The surface hardness is 824 HV,
and the density is 94.8%. Fig. 7 shows that the samples added with the
sintering aid have high densities and less pores in their
microstructure. Moreover, the samples with
sintering aid have a wrapping structure, indicating that the grain boundary
particles migrate during sintering, the grain boundary is coated, and the
particles are effectively bonded to the particles, thereby lifting the sample.
Fig. 4 Fig. 4. Effect of sintering aids type on the surface topography of materials. |
Fig. 5 Fig. 5. Effect of sintering aids on density of materials. |
Fig. 6 Fig. 6. Effect of sintering aids on surface hardness of materials. |
Fig. 7 Fig. 7. Effect of sintering aids on the microstructure of materials. |
Fig. 8a
shows the materials sintered using the composite powder
prepared through chemical precipitation, and Fig. 8b displays the materials
sintered using mixed aluminum and alumina powders via the ball mill method.
The composite powder is prepared with a stable mass ratio
of alumina to aluminum of 1:3. According to the comparison of Fig. 8a and b,
the surface of the sample in Fig. 8a is flatter, and the sample is intact
without defects. No cracking or delamination occurs, no pores are found on the surface,
and the sample is no powder drop after
demolding and sintering. These findings
indicated that the bonding strength of aluminum powder and alumina powder in the sample is high, which is reflected in
the hardness test data. As shown in Table 1, the voids are high in the material
due to the low density, thus resulting in the high resistivity and conversely
low resistivity of the metal. The alumina powder coated on the surface of the
aluminum powder by the precipitation method has a finer particle size, a more
uniform coating, and a lower driving force for sintering. Sintering under the
same conditions can make the cermet densification better. However, fine pores
are found on the surface of the sample in Fig. 8b, the distribution range is
relatively wide, the surface flatness is not high, and the density is
relatively low. Fig. 9 shows that the alumina particles in the
sample of Fig. 9a are
fine and have a uniform size and distribution around the large particles; in addition, the filling ability is strong,
the sintering activity is high, and the degree of material compactness is high
[18-20]. Given that the fine alumina particles can be uniformly distributed
around the aluminum particles, the surface hardness of the sample is high. The
sample in Fig. 9b is a powder that can be directly
purchased from the factory. The uniformity of the powder particles is poor, the
particle size is large, the sintering property of the particles is relatively
poor, and the filling ability between particles is poor. The microstructure
also shows that a part of the void remains inside the material and forms pores,
resulting in a decrease in the density and surface hardness. The surface hardness
of die-cast aluminum is about 120. By adding alumina powder to enhance the
surface hardness, the surface hardness can reach more than 800. It can be seen
that the enhancement effect is quite obvious.
Fig. 8 Fig. 8. Effect of raw materials type on the microstructure of materials. |
Fig. 9 Fig. 9. Effect of raw materials type on the microstructure of materials. |
Table 1 Table 1. The properties of materials using different raw materials type. |
The following conclusions were obtained, the density of
the cermet is increased first and then decreased with an increasing the ratio
of raw material aluminum, the surface hardness shows a similar trend. When the
mass ratio of alumina to aluminum is 1:3, the prepared cermet is
intact. The better properties, density, and surface hardness of
cermet are obtained using this ration, and aluminum and alumina are evenly
distributed. MgO as a sintering aid has better sintering densification than SiO2
and Y2O3, thereby the cermet shows the better excellent
densification degree and high hardness. The cermet with composite powder
prepared through precipitation has better performance than that prepared by
ball milling method. The internal alumina particle size is fine and uniform,
and the density and surface hardness are higher. The density is 97.1%, the
surface hardness is 875 HV, and the electric resistivity is 0.0169 Ω·m.
The authors are thankful for the financial support provide
by the Science and Technology Found of the Educational
Department of Jiangxi Province, China (GJJ171133), Teaching Reform Research
Fund for Higher Education of Jiangxi Province (JXJG-18-22-2), and the Science and Technology Found
of Jiujiang University, China (2016KJ005).
2020; 21(1): 21-25
Published on Feb 28, 2020
introduction
experimental
materials and methods
results and discussion
conclusion
aKey laboratory for Industrial Ceramics of Jiangxi Province, School of Materials and Chemistry Engineering, Pingxiang University, Pingxiang 337055 China
b