Articles
  • Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using titanium tetraisopropoxide and starch
  • Soo-Jong Kima,* and Kenji Oginob

  • aDepartment of Advanced Materials & Chemical Engineering, Halla University, 28 Halladaegil, Wonju, Kangwon 26404, Korea
    bGraduate School of Bio-Applications and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakacho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-8588, Japan

Abstract

Simple synthesis of nanocrystalline titanium dioxide (TiO2) by impregnation method was investigated. Titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) was used as the precursor and starch as the impregnations matrix. TiO2 nanoparticles of 100 nm in size were synthesized by varying the conditions. Crystallization and the growth of the particles were accelerated with increasing calcination temperature and time. The X-ray diffraction study shows that the product has anatase crystal structure at calcination temperatures below 600 oC. Anatase phase and rutile phase coexisted at 700 oC. At temperatures above 700 oC, the intensity of the anatase crystal phase peaks decreased and a peak of the new rutile crystal phase appeared at 2θ of 27.42(110), 36.11(101), 41.28(111) and 55.06(220). In more than 800 oC of temperature, rutile phase only existence.


Keywords: TiO2, Starch, Nanoparticle

introduction

There are about 11 types of titanium dioxide crystals as such as anatase, retiles, and brookite etc. Of these, anatase, rutile and brookite are the best formed and exhibit excellent features. Titanium dioxide is highly oxidizing, harmless to the human body, and very stable. In addition, the band gap energy is about 3 eV, which is the optical semiconductor characteristic [1]. TiO2 particles with excellent electrical, magnetic, catalytic, electrochemical and optical properties are used in various industrial fields [2-5]. TiO2 has a very high refractive index and is excellent in whiteness, and thus is used for the preparation of white pigments and various pigments. In particular, ultraviolet light absorbing ability is excellent in the ultraviolet wavelength range of 400 nm or less, and it is chemically stable and used as a UV blocking agent [6, 7]. In addition, due to the characteristics of ultrafine particles, it has a large specific surface area, strong durability, and excellent photocatalytic ability and is used in various catalysts, catalyst supports, sterilizing media, and sensors [8-12]. We have previously reported the synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles using pulp as the impregnation matrix [13-15]. In this synthetic method, a polymer material having a microfibril structure is impregnated with a metal salt, and then the impregnated mixture is dried and fired to prepare ceramic nanoparticles. This method can control the particle size by changing the type of the impregnation medium, the heat treatment conditions, and the concentration of the aqueous metal salt solution [16]. It is also suitable for the synthesis of ceramics nanoparticles with a uniform particle size distribution in a simple process without using the alkaline organic solvent used in the precipitation method [17]. In this study, impregnation method was selected as a method for synthesizing titanium oxide nanoparticles. Titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) was used as the starting material of this synthesis method, and starch was used instead of pulp as the impregnation matrix. We chose Starch as a matrix because starch is economically advantageous because of its simpler manufacturing process than industrial pulp. Pulp is manufactured in paper mills, which requires a lot of wood to get 1 kg of pulp. On the other hand, Starch can be obtained directly by grinding grain or plant. Starch in powder form can be impregnated more than pulp because it has a larger surface area than plate-type industrial pulp. As a result, yields can be increased and economic processes can be developed. Pulp having a plate-like dense and rigid structure has a problem that TTIP is not completely impregnated. Starch in powder form, however, does not have this problem. Starch with fine particles and large surface area is easy to impregnate with TTIP. On the other hand, Starch is not easy to impregnate with aqueous solution. Starch dissolves in water to a certain extent and agglomerates into a massive mass, which is inconvenient for drying and firing operations.

experimental

Titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP, ≥95.0%), isopropanol (C3H8O, ≥99.7%) and starch (C6H10O5)n, ≥99.5%) were purchased Dae Jung Chemical Co. All the chemical reagents were analytically pure and used without further purification. The precursor solution was 5 mL of TTIP mixed with 25 mL isopropanol under a vigorous stirring. Schematic diagram of the TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by this method is shown in Fig. 1. The starch and TTIP precursor solution were impregnated at a weight ratio of 1:1. The impregnated precursor was dried at 120 oC for 3 hours. The dried precursor was calcined in an electric furnace at 500 oC for 1 hour to remove the organic components in the precursor and the starch. This calcined sample was pulverized with agate and then calcined in an electric furnace at a temperature range of 600 oC and 1,000 oC (heating rate:5 oC/min) for 1 to 3 hours. The calcined samples were pulverized to obtain final powdery TiO2. X-ray diffraction pattern was investigated by DMAX-2200V/PC High power X-ray diffractometer of Rigaku. Cu-Kα with a Ni filter was used to measure a scanning speed of 5o/min, an acceleration voltage of 40 kV, and an acceleration current of 30 mA in a diffraction angle (2θ) range of 10 to 80o. FE-SEM (Model S-4300, Hitachi, Acceleration Voltage 17 kV) was used for surface structure analysis such as the particle size of the prepared TiO2 powder.

Fig. 1

Preparation procedures of TiO2 nano powders.

results and discussion

Fig. 2 shows the XRD diffraction pattern of TiO2 powder calcined at 500-800 oC for 1 hour, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2(a) and (b), the XRD diffraction patterns of powders prepared at 500 oC and 600 oC showed only an anatase crystalline form. In these samples, diffraction peaks of the anatase crystal form were found at the 2θ values of 25.3, 37.9, 48.1, 53.9, 55.0, 62.8, 68.9, 70.41 and 75.18, and the corresponding Miller indices were (101), (004), (211), (204), (116), (220), and (215). When the calcination time was increased from 1 hour to 3 hours in this temperature range, the size of the crystals increased. However, the crystal phase did not change and only anatase phase appeared. On the other hand, in the XRD diffraction pattern of the calcined powder at 700 oC shown in Fig. 2(c), anatase phase and rutile phase existed together. At this time, the intensity of the diffraction peak of the anatase phase was lower than that of the calcined powder at 600 oC, and the diffraction peak newly appeared at the 2θ value of 27.42(110), 36.11(101), 41.28(111) and 55.06(220) are due to the formation of the rutile crystal form[13]. In the diffraction pattern of samples prepared at 800 oC with increasing calcination temperature, only rutile phase, which is a crystalline form at high temperature, appeared. Fig. 3 shows the XRD diffraction pattern of the samples prepared by different calcination times of 1 hour and 3 hours at 700 oC. Both the anatase phase and the rutile phase exist in Fig. 3(a) and (b). Therefore, it was found that there existed two crystal phases regardless of increase of calcination time at 700 oC. The calcination time increased to 3 hours Fig. 3(b), the diffraction intensity of the anatase peak is weakened. At 600 oC, the change in the crystal phase, which did not occur even when the calcination time was increased, appeared only at 700 oC. As a result, the transition temperature of the crystal phase was 700 oC. Therefore, it can be seen that the calcination temperature has a greater influence on the crystal phase transition than the calcination time. On the other hand, in Fig. 3(b) where the calcination time was increased to 3 hours, the peak of the atanase crystal phase exhibited lower strength than that of Fig.3 (a) when the calcination time was 1 hour. This suggests that the calcination time has some influence on the transition phase. As a result, it was confirmed that the anatase crystal phase was obtained at a synthesis temperature of 600 oC or lower, and the rutile phase was formed at a synthesis temperature of 700 oC or higher. The reason why the crystal phase differs according to the synthesis temperature is that the surface energy changes depending on the particle size. Since the surface energy of anatase phase particles is less than the surface energy of rutile particles, they are synthesized at lower temperatures. In our earlier work, when pulp was used as the impregnation matrix, anatase phase and rutile phase appeared at a calcination temperature of 600 oC. There was a difference in the crystalline phase as the impregnated matrix changed from pulp to starch. That is, when a pulp was used, a rutile phase was obtained at a temperature lower by 100 oC. This is because micro-morphology of pulp and starch are different. Starch produces more heat energy than pulp when burned. Thus, when starch is used as a matrix, more heat energy is transferred to the precursor TTIP. It is believed that TTIP is decomposed at a lower temperature, and TiO2 has a lower production temperature. Fig. 4(a) shows the EDX spectra of samples calcined at 800 oC for 1 hour. The elemental peaks corresponding to titanium and oxygen were found, and the distribution of these two elements was found to be in the form of TiO2 by calculating the stoichiometry ratio. Fig. 4(b) and (c) shows SEM photographs of samples calcined at 700 oC for 1 hour and 3 hours, respectively. As can be seen in the figure, crystals grow as the calcination time increases. Fig. 5 shows the results of FE-SEM measurement of the morphology of synthesized TiO2 particles when the calcination time was fixed to 1 hour and the calcination temperature was changed from 600 oC to 1,100 oC. The samples calcined at 600 oC showed very small particle size (≤50 nm). Since the anatase phase is more stable than the rutile phase as the particle size is smaller, crystals of the anatase phase are formed only at a low calcination temperature of 600 oC or lower (Fig. 2 (a)). In the samples calcined at 700 oC, grain growth (≤100 nm) began to be observed with increasing crystallinity. In the samples calcined at 800 oC, the shape and size of the particles grew to more than 100 nm, and crystallization progressed over a wide range and uniform particle size distribution began to appear. At the calcination temperature of 900 oC to 1,100 oC, the growth of the particles is promoted, and the phenomenon of crystal growth (≥100 nm) is observed. The crystallization of the particles was promoted at 1,100 oC, and the rutile-phase TiO2 crystal was clearly identified.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of TiO2 powders in various calcination temperatures for 1 hr.

Fig. 3

XRD patterns of TiO2 powders at 700 oC at various calcination time (a) 1 hr and (b) 3 hr.

Fig. 4

EDX and FE-SEM images of TiO2 powders in various calcination conditions: (a) 800 oC, 1 hr, (b) 700 oC, 1 hr, and (c) 700 oC, 3 hrs.

Fig. 5

FE-SEM images of TiO2 powders at various calcination temperatures for 1 hr: (a) 600 oC, (b) 700 oC and (c) 800 oC, (d) 900 oC and (e) 1,100 oC.

conclusions

TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized under various conditions by impregnation method. TTIP was used as the precursor and starch as the impregnations matrix. As a result of XRD analysis, only anatase phase was formed when calcined at 500-600 oC. At 700 oC, the anatase phase and the rutile phase existed together. At 800 oC and above, only the rutile phase existed. TiO2 with a size of 100 nm or less were obtained when calcined for 1hour at 700 oC. As a result of firing at 600-800 oC for 1-3 hours with different calcination conditions, crystallization was promoted and grain size was increased with increasing calcination temperature and time.

References
  • 1. Y. Xu and M.A. Schoonen, Am. Miner. 85 (2000) 543-556.
  •  
  • 2. J. Zou and W. Zheng, Ceram. Int. 42 (2016) 8198-8205.
  •  
  • 3. C. Tiana, Mat. Res. Bul. 103 (2018) 83-88.
  •  
  • 4. Y.-S. Song, S. Son, D.-Y. Lee, M.-H. Lee, and B.-Y. Kim, J. Cer. Proc. Rea. 17[11] (2016) 1197-1201.
  •  
  • 5. H.-S. Lee, S.-M. Koo, and J.-W. Yoo, J. Cer. Proc. Rea. 13[S2] (2012) s300-s303.
  •  
  • 6. J. Liu and W.X. Wang, Sci. Tot. Envir. 593-594 (2017) 47-53.
  •  
  • 7. J.J. Reinosa, C.M.Á. Docio, V.Z. Ramírez, and J.F.F. Lozano, Ceram. Int. 44 (2018) 2827-2834.
  •  
  • 8. V. Likodimos, Appl. Catal. B: Envir. 230 (2018) 269-303.
  •  
  • 9. M. Qamar, B. Zhang, and Y. Feng, Opt. Mat. 89 (2019) 368-374.
  •  
  • 10. J.C.C. Franco and M.Á. Láinez, Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 90 (2019) 190-197.
  •  
  • 11. N.D. Chinh, C.-J. Kim, and D.J. Kim, J. All. and Comp. 778 (2019) 247-255.
  •  
  • 12. K.-W. Kim, S.-H. You, S.-S. Park, G.-H. Kang, W.-T. Bae, and D.-W. Shin, J. Cer. Proc. Rea. 9[5] (2008) 530-537.
  •  
  • 13. S.-J. Kim, C.H. Han, and J.H. Shim, J. Kor. Cer. Soc. 50[6] (2013) 489-494.
  •  
  • 14. S.-J. Kim and C.-H. Han, J. Cer. Proc. Rea. 19[2] (2018) 130-133.
  •  
  • 15. S.-J. Kim, T. Masaki, S.-H. Choi, and D.-H. Yoon, J. Cer. Proc. Rea. 17[4] (2016) 338-343.
  •  
  • 16. N.M. Deraz, J. Ind. Environ. Chem. 2[1] (2018) 19-21.
  •  
  • 17. C. Tian, Mat. Res. Bul. 103 (2018) 83-88.
  •  

This Article

  • 2019; 20(6): 665-669

    Published on Dec 31, 2019

  • 10.36410/jcpr.2019.20.6.665
  • Received on Jun 24, 2019
  • Revised on Sep 17, 2019
  • Accepted on Sep 26, 2019

Correspondence to

  • Soo-Jong Kim
  • Department of Advanced Materials & Chemical Engineering, Halla University, 28 Halladaegil, Wonju, Kangwon 26404, Korea
    Tel : +82-33-760-1237 Fax: +82-33-760-1290

  • E-mail: sjkim@halla.ac.kr