Articles
  • Etch selectivities of mask materials for micromachining of ultrananocrystalline diamond film 
  • Byoung Su Choia, Jong Cheon Parka, Sungu Hwangb, Jin Kon Kimb, Sung Chul Shinc, In Won Leed, Jeong Ho Ryue, and Hyun Chob,*
  • a Department of Nano Fusion Technology, Pusan National University, Gyeongnam 50463, Korea b Department of Nanomechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea c Navel Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea d Global Core Research Center for Ships and Offshore Plants, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea e Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungbuk 27469, Korea
Abstract
Ultra-nanocrystalline diamond (UNCD) is a very promising candidate for microelectromechanical system moving mechanicalassemblies (MEMS MMAs) due to its excellent mechanical and tribological properties. In order to fabricate UNCD-basedMEMS MMAs, it is important to find the mask material suitable for micromachining process. The etch characteristics ofUNCD and selected mask materials (Ni, Al and SiO2) were examined in O2/Ar, O2/CF4 and O2/SF6 inductively coupled plasmas,and the etch selectivities of the mask materials were compared. The Ni showed very high etch selectivities to UNCD (≥ 50 : 1)in all three oxygen-based ICP discharges and the maximum etch selectivity of ~140 : 1 for UNCD over Ni was obtained in10O2/5Ar ICP discharges. The Al and SiO2 mask layers presented relatively good etch selectivities in 10O2/5Ar ICP discharges,6.3-28.3 : 1 for UNCD over Al and 4-20 : 1 for UNCD over SiO2, respectively. Under most of the conditions examined in 10O2/5CF4 and 10O2/5SF6 discharges, the Al mask showed relatively low etch selectivities of ~ 5 : 1 while the SiO2 showed etchselectivities less than unity due to the extremely high volatility of SiFx etch products.

Keywords: Ultrananocrystalline diamond, Micromachining, High density plasma etching, Mask material, Etch selectivity

This Article

  • 2016; 17(11): 1123-1126

    Published on Nov 30, 2016

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: